The Gay Debate
Here’s a story:
Recently,
former San Francisco 49ers lineman Kwame Harris got in a scuffle with an ex
about soy sauce. This resulted in an
assault charge against Harris. Soy sauce-based
arguments happen more often than you think, people. That’s not the interesting
part. The interesting part is that
Harris’s ex happens to be a man. Yes,
hard to believe as it is, a professional football player was gay.
As you
may know, the San Francisco 49ers happen to be in the Super Bowl this
year. As a result, on media day, a
number of the current players were asked if knowing that a teammate was gay
would affect the atmosphere in the locker room.
Most said a teammate’s sexuality would not have made a difference, as,
being professionals, they are there to do a job, namely win games, not
wondering what their teammates are doing with their penises in their spare
time.
Non-grammar-award-winning-cornerback Chris Culliver did not share that
opinion, however, and openly worried that gay germs might infect him and ruin
his good time (paraphrasing). *
Here’s
my beef: there are a number of things that I have opinions about, and not
favorable opinions, either. I am 99%
opposed to marriage for me, and about 90% opposed to it for you. I think that conspicuous consumption is
either a sign of a small penis or daddy issues.
I have found that people who talk about how great they are at religion
are usually pretty bad at being humans.
But the truth of the matter is that no one gives a shit about my
opinions because they are stupid, and, technically, a little crazy. So how is it that we provide a forum for
people to continuously express their stupid and crazy opinions about human
sexuality?
I know
what some of you are thinking: that this is something that should be debated
because the Bible says or doesn’t say something about sexuality, or because
sexuality is or isn’t a choice. Well,
guess what? The Bible also has an opinion about ham sandwiches. But do we
feel the need to debate ham sandwiches ad nauseum on every television show and
every blessed comment on USAToday? We do
not, America. And, on top of that, lots
of things are choices. Men under thirty
who grow full-on Ulysses S. Grant beards make a choice, but people allow them
to go about their lives with nary a word, despite the fact that I CAN GUARANTEE
YOU that their partner/loved one thinks that they look MUCH BETTER without the
beard. So, given the fact that we feel
perfectly comfortable allowing some biblical references and some choices to
slide, why is it that we must pick on sexuality?
Don’t
get me wrong: I believe in the marketplace of ideas. But there’s got to come a time when we say, “Thanks,
we’ve heard enough on this issue.”
Right? Because all we keep doing
now is recycling the same things that people have been saying for hundreds of
years now- the same things that people used to say about interracial marriage,
women voting, and abolishing slavery. Aren’t
we intelligent enough to move beyond that?
Oscar
Wilde- a man who, coincidentally, was imprisoned for homosexuality- wrote, “We
are each our own devil, and we make this world our hell.” When we insist on pretending that sexuality
is a legitimate debate, we are simply bedeviling ourselves. Instead, why don’t we live by the words of my
hero, Kurt Vonnegut: “If you can do no good, at least do no harm.” Regardless of whether you believe gayness is
good, bad, weird, awesome, or something else, can’t we all agree that to show
loving kindness is the truest expression of humanity?
And
besides, don’t we have more important things to debate? Children die from preventable causes. Mentally ill people are untreated. Rape remains a powerful tool of oppression,
and according to Stephen Colbert, bears are out to get us. Gayness is something that can’t be solved,
and doesn’t need a solution. Bears, on
the other hand…
* Culliver’s actual quote was, “"I
don't do the gay guys man…I don't do that. No, we don't got no gay people on
the team, they gotta get up out of here if they do. Can't be with that sweet
stuff. Nah…can't be…in the locker room man. Nah." A later tweet on an unrelated topic also
demonstrated that Culver is unaware of the their/there distinction.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home